User talk:Danuhau

Banana Bomb
I can't believe this. What happened to the "Banana Bomb" article? Did you delete it? If you did, then... I don't really know what to say to you.

Boggy B (talk) 11:34, August 8, 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you for notifying me. I have deleted some unused redirect pages from this page, but I did not delete the article. Anyhow, I have restored it now. I think this occured because I am editing on an Eee pad which is not really made for this purpose.


 * - Danuhau (talk) 22:17, August 8, 2014 (UTC)


 * Oh, okay, good. By the way, Captain Falcon has returned, he created an account. Now his username is KimKilWhan7. Don't block him yet, so far he has done nothing wrong, but if he begins another argument then you should block him permanently.
 * Boggy B (talk) 02:31, August 9, 2014 (UTC)


 * Can you stop accusing me?? You may not know but I am not lying. I joined wikia yesterday and I am not this "Captain Falcon" character. Why do you think I am him anyway? If it's because I'm not siding with you then not everyone sees stuff your way. If you want to discuss this further contact me via live chat on this wika tomorrow at 2:30 P:M eastern time. KimKilWhan7 (talk) 02:40, August 9, 2014 (UTC)


 * Look. I'm not an idiot. I know it's you. I can tell. I can recognize people by the way they type or what they say. Here is an example...
 * "MY OCCUPATION IS: Smash bros. Quality time with loved ones. Jesus. ETC."
 * That is exactly what Captain Falcon would say. There are other ways I can tell that you're Captain Falcon (like the way you type). A live chat will not be necessary. By the way, how old are you? Please tell me the truth. As I said before, lying is a sin. So please just stop lying and tell me your age.
 * Boggy B (talk) 02:47, August 9, 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm not lying please stop tailing me. I just joined yesterday I don't need someone accusing me to be a misunderstood user who thought they were helping. You don't know what Captain Falcon would say, oh wait, I do. He would say

"Show me ya moves"

"Falcon Punch"

"Falcon Kick"

"Come on, Blue Falcon!"

"HYESZ!"

Anything else a human would say.


 * See? Captain Falcon is a video game character. Don't believe me? Ok. Now I don't want to spark any arguments so let's see the good in this to not jump to conclusions, and why would I tell you my age? KimKilWhan7 (talk) 02:59, August 9, 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes, Captain Falcon would say that. He named himself after that video game character. He's a seemingly obsessed fan of Super Smash Bros. just like you, and is very religious, just like you. So this must be one hell of a coincidence, eh? No. Not at all.
 * And you don't need to tell me your age, I already know that you're 13 years old.
 * Boggy B (talk) 03:05, August 9, 2014 (UTC)

"Worms 4: Mayhem story"
Why didn't you delete the "Worms 4: Mayhem story" article? That page is useless now, I added all the information about Story Mode in the "Worms 4: Mayhem" article. I'll also add information about the enemy teams/mini-bosses/bosses on the "Worms 4: Mayhem - Missions &amp; Maps" article. The "Worms 4: Mayhem story" article is messy and has some false info anyway. And I don't want too many articles related to Worms 4: Mayhem here. Seriously, there are a lot. We don't need that many.

Boggy B (talk) 09:10, August 11, 2014 (UTC)


 * I did not know you transferred the information from that page. I'll delete it now.


 * - Danuhau (talk) 12:59, August 11, 2014 (UTC)


 * Oh, okay, good.
 * Boggy B (talk) 14:51, August 11, 2014 (UTC)

Help
For some reason I can't remove the "1st Generation Weapons" and "2nd Generation Weapons" categories from the "Bungee" article. This is really stupid.

Boggy B (talk) 10:45, August 13, 2014 (UTC)


 * I will put some time aside to split the categories (because a utility does not belong in a weapon category).


 * - Danuhau (talk) 17:12, August 13, 2014 (UTC)


 * One more thing, are the Blow Torch and Pneumatic Drill classified as weapons or utilities? Maybe both? In all the games they appear in, they are found in Weapon Crates, not Utility Crates. And they can also be used as weapons. I think they're more like weapons, rather than utilities. But I'm not sure. I don't know which categories they belong in.


 * Boggy B (talk) 08:58, August 14, 2014 (UTC)


 * I mean that they are utilities. Sure, they can be used as weapons too, they have more than two uses. Other utilities can also be used as a weapon, like the Wrench from Worms: Revolution. Also, If you look at the Fire Punch: It can sometimes be used to reach a higher ledge.
 * - Danuhau (talk) 14:27, August 15, 2014 (UTC)


 * They appear in Weapon Crates, and they can also harm or even kill other Worms... So should I classify them as both weapons and utilities? Or only utilities? (And I'm talking about categories.)
 * Boggy B (talk) 14:35, August 15, 2014 (UTC)


 * Classify them as utilities. The fact that they appeared in weapon crates could be a goof, or done purpously to make it inpredictable.
 * - Danuhau (talk) 14:42, August 15, 2014 (UTC)

We need more users.
Hey, remember when Koenachtig, Orangitu, Oscuritaforze, Q*terplx, TheShadowAssassin, and KimKilWhan7 were here? Now it's only you and me, no-one else. This is unacceptable. And I don't care if Captain Falcon (now KimKilWhan7) was our enemy, at least he was an active user and wanted to make some edits sometimes. We need more active users. Any ideas?

And I'm starting to regret agreeing with anonymous editing being disabled. Captain Falcon is already gone anyway, and we could have had some other anonymous users here making edits. This wiki might soon die. I'll probably be alone soon, I fear that you may fall into inactivity as well. So, what are we to do? I'm not sure if begging Oscuritaforze to return along with the other users is a good idea, although it is seemingly our only option, along with enabling anonymous editing, or perhaps promoting this wiki.

Boggy B (talk) 20:48, August 15, 2014 (UTC)


 * Of course there are Worms fans out there, but few of them don't know about this wiki. This wiki will not die, it will always be someone here to edit and read our articles. It is just not so obvious that there are users here, since few are commenting on talk pages or making edits.


 * Anonymous editing is not good. Think about it: No I.P.s are allowed to edit now, and no innocent users are being affected by recieving an I.P. which is blocked. Furthermore, if a visitor wants to edit here, just create an account. It is just so easy. If someone starts vandalizing, they will be blocked immediately, and the chance of them making new accounts is really small. I'm glad I got Orangitu's opinion on it before he became inactive.


 * - Danuhau (talk) 14:37, August 16, 2014 (UTC)


 * I just want this wiki to be as popular as some other wikis, such as Smashpedia or the Call of Duty Wiki. Those were mere examples. There are a lot of popular wikis out there with hundreds of active users who contribute every minute or second, and here we only have 2 users, with only one of them being an admin/bureaucrat and a change usually being made once every few hours. Both of us can't contribute to this wiki forever. But it wouldn't be a problem on a popular wiki if a few users or admins fell into inactivity, there would still be hundreds of other active users and 5-10 more active admins or bureaucrats.
 * And at this rate the wiki would become incredibly boring. People are more social and actually try to get along in some popular wikis, and they discuss things and do other stuff. All I can do in this wiki is try to earn badges.
 * Boggy B (talk) 21:06, August 16, 2014 (UTC)

Request
I tried renaming the "Armageddon (Weapon)" article to just "Armageddon", because we don't need "(Weapon)" in the title and it's better this way. But I couldn't do it, it says the "Armageddon" page already exists, but it's a redirect. I'm still (somewhat) new to editing with an account, and I don't know how to use all the wiki features. So can you tell me how to move a page to a redirect that already exists? And renaming the "Armageddon (Weapon)" page would also be appreciated.

Boggy B (talk) 20:11, August 21, 2014 (UTC)


 * Done. Here is how it works: the page already using the name was a redirect page to Armageddon (disambiguation) page. I deleted the redirect, leaving the page empty. Then I could move it :)
 * - Danuhau (talk) 17:02, August 22, 2014 (UTC)


 * Okay, thank you.
 * Boggy B (talk) 23:06, August 22, 2014 (UTC)

Request 2
In the "Worms Breakout" article, the caption of the first photo (the one that shows the original Worms Breakout logo) is messed up, and it's all the crappy editor's fault. I tried to fix it, even in Source Mode, but nothing happened. It was supposed to look like this - "Worms Breakout logo.", but it looks like this instead - "Worms Breakout logo.". Can you find a way to fix this?

HEY. Are you there?

Boggy B (talk) 08:39, August 27, 2014 (UTC)


 * I think I was able to do what you requested


 * - Danuhau (talk) 16:04, August 28, 2014 (UTC)


 * I see you couldn't fix it... It must be impossible, then. Stupid thing. Oh well, thanks anyway.


 * EDIT: Never mind. Surprisingly, Oscuritaforze came to the rescue.


 * Boggy B (talk) 18:14, August 28, 2014 (UTC)

Favorite Worms Game
I saw your profile and apparently you own both Worms 4: Mayhem (PC) and Worms: Ultimate Mayhem (PlayStation 3), just like I do. It says Worms: Ultimate Mayhem is your favorite game instead of Worms 4: Mayhem. That actually surprised me, especially since you own the PlayStation 3 version of Worms: Ultimate Mayhem and the PC version of Worms 4: Mayhem. My favorite game is Worms 4: Mayhem. You can see my full list of games in order from most favorite to least favorite on my profile.

So, perhaps you could explain why you believe Worms: Ultimate Mayhem is better? My favorite is Worms 4: Mayhem because it brought back memories from around 2005/2006, it has the Icarus Potion Cheat (it was removed in Worms: Ultimate Mayhem), better music (especially the Sudden Death music and the second Prehistoric track, but that's just my opinion, and both games have great music), and most importantly, I have the PC version of the game, while I have Worms: Ultimate Mayhem for the PlayStation 3, like you do. I prefer PC games and for good reasons.

I'm not trying to force my opinion onto you, I just decided to have a nice discussion to make this wiki less boring and wanted to know about your opinion on both games.

Boggy B (talk) 06:51, August 29, 2014 (UTC)


 * Like you, I have my reasons why Worms: Ultimate Mayhem is my favorite. I like consoles better than computers, because the computer I use to play is old and crashes a lot. Secondly, Worms: Ultimate Mayhem is an improved version of Worms 4: Mayhem. It has better graphics, dialogs, and it includes the Binoculars, which I love!


 * Yes, it is too bad the Icarus Potion cheat is gone, it was kinda cool. But Worms: Ultimate Mayhem is still great it my opinion. New levels, new features like hats, gloves maps, better online play etc. I understand why you like Worms 4: Mayhem, because it is classic and awesome, but I really like the improved version.


 * - Danuhau (talk) 08:15, August 29, 2014 (UTC)


 * Hmm, good reasons... But I also forgot one reason why I prefer Worms 4: Mayhem, how could I forget this one? I can tweak the game, by tweaking the Local.xml file. I made overpowered and bad-ass Team Weapons, such as the Hypernova Bomb, an Air Strike weapon, and my most powerful weapon which could easily destroy the entire landscape, killing everyone. The Supernova Missile is a Launched weapon and is less powerful but has some really nice special effects instead of the standard explosion effect, and can do some major damage to a landscape. In Worms: Ultimate Mayhem, since I have the PlayStation 3 version, I can't tweak anything. My Hypernova Bomb is just a normal Team Weapon with a standard explosion (at least it's powerful, it can do up to 75 damage and can easily knock Worms into the water). I'm not quite sure if the PC version of Worms: Ultimate Mayhem can be tweaked, since I don't own the PC version. I don't really think it can be tweaked.


 * I do agree with the graphics being better in the remake, the dialog is exactly the same though, except they have actual voices now instead of the simple "me-me" sounds. There's nothing wrong with that, I was just correcting you. The game's accessories are the same as well, but for the PlayStation 3 version (not sure about the PC version) there's also special content that can be unlocked by owning other certain Team17 games on the PlayStation 3. And there are a few new landscapes as well, but for the PC Worms 4: Mayhem, you can download Map Packs with some having over 85 custom landscapes (not made by Team17). I do agree with the online play in the remake being better though, and there are nice additions as well, such as the Worms 3D Campaign Mode.


 * Lastly, I understand that your PC is not really that good, but I prefer playing on the PC. There are also more controls for the PC (you can taunt the enemy Worms and do other stuff, and also control the camera better), since there are obviously more buttons on a keyboard than a controller for consoles.


 * By the way, good news, I created an account on Worms Knowledge Base! Maybe you should too, it's extremely quick and easy.


 * Boggy B (talk) 09:09, August 29, 2014 (UTC)


 * If you are going to play a game, I mean you should do it right. Tweaking equals cheating, especially if you play online. I have seen that you state on your page that you think you can beat anyone in Worms 4: Mayhem... No wonder you can if you tweak your weapons.
 * - Danuhau (talk) 12:41, September 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Did you read my whole profile? If you did, you would know that I only make tweaked Team Weapons for fun, because they're cool and really destructive. When I play online I switch weapons for my team, I use the Nova Strike (a normal Team Weapon, not tweaked). And I can beat anyone because I'm naturally good at the game, I'm very skillful, I don't use cheats or tweaks to win. I show my friends or other players my tweaked Team Weapons if they want, because they're cool. When I say "I can beat anyone", I mean it, I'm actually a master and one of the best players of the Worms 4: Mayhem community... I'm not bragging, but you misunderstood when I said I could beat anyone. I don't cheat, I only do that for fun or when other players want it...


 * Boggy B (talk) 13:05, September 6, 2014 (UTC)

"Template:UserInfobox"
I have an idea. I added an "Infobox" template in my profile, and I like the way it turned out. We should make it a real template, name it "UserInfobox", and you can use the template for your profile as well, and for other users too if they want. What do you think?

Boggy B (talk) 09:17, August 31, 2014 (UTC)


 * I am not that good at templates, so I do not have much to say


 * - Danuhau (talk) 10:11, September 1, 2014 (UTC)


 * Oh well, Oscuritaforze created a "UserInfobox" template anyway, although he did make a few changes to the original... Thanks anyway, Oscuritaforze.


 * Boggy B (talk) 17:16, September 1, 2014 (UTC)

Combined Articles
Q*terplx has combined every article based on different types of Crates into just one article, the "Crate" article, and added info about the types of Crates there. He also combined the "Girder" and "Girder Starter Pack" articles, and the "Nuclear Bomb" and "Indian Nuclear Test" articles. I know he was just trying to help, but combining articles results in less articles in this wiki and less info as well, if they weren't combined, each article would have more information, just one article isn't enough for all that information. So, I'm still not that experienced with redirects and combining/restoring articles and whatnot (I believe only an administrator could restore combined articles), so could you restore those pages with all the info on them? It would also increase the wiki's article count, even you seemed to dislike the idea of combining them (it was quite a long time ago).

EDIT: Not trying to be annoying, but a reply would be appreciated...

Boggy B (talk) 14:05, September 6, 2014 (UTC)


 * I do not ignore, I am just busy. Patience is a virtue.

I think it's time...
I should become an admin now. It's been a long time since I previously asked for this, you said I was "rushing it"... Trust me, I'm not "rushing it" this time. And I know you're busy, but I've waited a bit too long, don't you think? If you still think I shouldn't become an admin yet, then... I'll probably have to leave this wiki. I'm sorry, it may seem a little extreme, but there would be no purpose for me to be a part of this wiki if I'm never going to earn a promotion.
 * I'm ranked #2 on this wiki achievement-wise (you're ranked #1), and I've earned 990 Achievement Points, almost 1,000.
 * These administrator abilities would be more useful or helpful if they were given to me (such as deleting articles and redirects, and customizing the wiki), since I visit this wiki everyday and I'm the most active and vital user here.
 * I can instantly block a vandal during your absence.
 * Someone needs to look over this wiki, you're not very active, so I should be given administrator and bureaucrat rights.
 * Remember when you said you needed to "clean up some old pages first", before you could promote me? Well, since you're not really doing anything right now, you could promote me and I'll clean up those pages for you.
 * I'm a huge fan of Worms and I have a lot of knowledge based on the series, I have 12 Worms games, and I've made a lot of useful edits in this wiki and created countless articles.

Take your time to decide, but I do hope you make the right decision. By the way, I've already applied my promotion request to the "Worms Wiki:Requests For Adminship" page, a long time ago.

Boggy B (talk) 05:45, September 12, 2014 (UTC)


 * There are many reasons why I have not promoted you. Infact, I am starting to doubt if you are the right candidate for this.


 * 1. Links on your page... I mean, really? lolwtf(...)yousuck.com is the most immature and retarded thing I've ever seen. What do you want to achieve with that?


 * 2. Rudeness, towards users and directly and in your page. I have changed your page several times, for example the age in your user template. I chose not to block you earlier when you expressed your rage towards vandals and Captain Falcon.


 * 3. Maturity: There is more on this topic, for example achievement points. You are awarded achievement points for hard work, not commenting because "you are trying to earn a badge". If you are running around posting random comments on blog posts just to earn badges, you cannot brag about how many you have.


 * 4. We all know that you have contributed a lot, but you are not the only one. In fact, I did approx. 2000 edits on this wiki with an I.P. before I used my account. Sometimes, I even forgot to log in, leaving an I.P. behind my edit. You drag the edit count, or as you say "countless edit" into the conversation at every chance.


 * 5. You are wayyyy to confident on this admin thing. This is one of your statements:


 * - Someone needs to become an admin before Danuhau falls into inactivity as well. That person is me.


 * You cannot say that you do not rush it... It is not an easy job to choose the staff here; it should be a dedicated and responsible team. Taking to consideration your incomplexitive nature, I never know what you are up to next. I need to trust you, to know that you are right for this wiki. So far, you are falling behind the dead lead you had two months ago.


 * 6. When I joined this wiki, I felt like I could be here forever. But the daily life is stressful, and I cannot be active all the time. You have stated like 50 times that you are not going to be as active as before/not going to be here forever, so why promote you then?


 * 7. As you may have realized, I am not doing anything atm. If you feel "forced to leave because you are not promoted", then suit yourself. This wiki is more or less dead. I do not know if Orangitu took all the users with him when he left, but it is surely quiet around here.


 * - Danuhau (talk) 18:59, September 12, 2014 (UTC)


 * Alright then, bye. Since I'm obviously never going to be promoted, I suppose I'll just have to leave this wiki and let it die. Not my problem anymore.


 * And about those links on my page, I added those in my page on another wiki, just to see what would happen if I clicked on those links. I forgot to remove them, now I did. Also, you've only changed my page once, not "several times".


 * And when I stated "50 times" that I would be inactive, I was busy that time and I didn't have an account, I didn't want to stay for that long. I'm not too busy anymore, so I decided to stay in this wiki, until now.


 * This wiki had only two users left, me and you. Now you're the only one left, because I'm leaving permanently. There are other wikis I contribute to. I'm really the only user here who ever wanted to be an admin, I doubt that there are other users here who want to be an admin, or any other users at all, so you're all alone now. Farewell.


 * Boggy B (talk) 19:27, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

Worms Forts: Under Siege missions
Are there any paes on this wiki for the missions (not deathmatch challenges) in Worms Forts: Under Siege? If not, each mission needs a page, and a summary page for all missions with the story portions of the missions included will also be needed. PartHunter (talk) 06:30, October 7, 2014 (UTC)


 * I will check if there are any pages for the missions, but I doubt it. And yes, it is useful to have.


 * - Danuhau (talk) 10:43, October 7, 2014 (UTC)

Gravestones, Helmets
I hae just noticed that there is only one page specifically on gravestones, and it is a list of gravestones in two games, so pages on gravestones probably should be created. Helmets also need at least one page, as they have none and they at least need a list page of all the ones in each game they appear in. PartHunter (talk) 04:04, October 9, 2014 (UTC)


 * Sure, do that - Danuhau (talk) 18:11, October 9, 2014 (UTC)