User talk:Danuhau

CC message
I was going to post this on community central, but the message wall function did not allow me to

If I blocked you, and you manage to return, I just had to block you again. I do not care about you trying to claim your innocence. And I removed your reply on the forum because of these simple facts: You don't need to show which side you are on, because it is clear. Also, if you are blocked, you have no reason to stick around. Just look at my replies on that page, and you will see that I am not incompetent in any way.

A reply to boggy/ (worms legend/dark vortex) 29.

- Danuhau (talk) 21:11, October 30, 2014 (UTC)


 * What happened when you tried to post that on CC? Did it give you an error message, or just eat your response? Oscuritaforze (talk) 05:36, October 31, 2014 (UTC)


 * The button which publishes the message stayed gray, meaning that i could not publish it.
 * - Danuhau (talk) 07:35, October 31, 2014 (UTC)

Redirects
Hey, just thought I'd let you know: no pages actually link to the "Worms revolution" redirect. I do acknowledge that attempting to go to the Worms Revolution page directly from that URL would no longer work if it were to be deleted, but directing users where they need to go is the purpose of the link to search for the page title which appears on a nonexistent page. Conveniently, said link would automatically lead directly to the proper page in this case, as the only difference in titles is capitalization (as an example, see "[ Worms armageddon]", click the "Search for 'Worms armageddon'" link). Overall, that page just doesn't serve much of a practical purpose. Oscuritaforze (talk) 20:21, October 30, 2014 (UTC)


 * I will look into it tomorrow. If there are several pages like this, I will have to remove them all. I did not understand what you meant with the search engine when you made the remark earlier, but now I can see the inconvenience
 * - Danuhau (talk) 21:08, October 30, 2014 (UTC)

Unneeded category
When finding categories that need being added, I found one (Unsourced Quotes) that was only on a single page, and that page was an anomynous user's talk page. I couldn't remove it, as it was added by a template I am completly unfamiliar with. Said page also contains no unsoured quotes, so could you please remove it? PartHunter (talk) 04:38, November 7, 2014 (UTC)


 * I agree with your statements, so I will delete this category.


 * - Danuhau (talk) 11:08, November 7, 2014 (UTC)

Message walls
Sorry for being late, but I thought I'd let you know that I've posted my opinion on the message wall discussion page. --Orangitu | Talk 11:19, November 18, 2014 (UTC)

About Boggy's block
Now that thing's have settled down, I thought I'd make another request regarding Boggy's block. I know this is something that most likely none of us are very keen on talking about, but Boggy has been messaging me on community central, and it seems he's very eager on participating in some of the discussions that happened recently on the wiki. So my request is, how about just removing his block entirely? I doubt that this'll do any harm to the wiki, and, if there ever was any lessons for him to learn, he's probably learnt it by now.

--Orangitu | Talk 11:42, November 18, 2014 (UTC)


 * When I first saw that he was infinitely blocked, I thought it was long overdue. Death threats, defacing other users' profiles, foul language, complaining about everything, arguing with everyone (including that stupid religious argument that derailed this wiki for months), sockpuppet accounts to evade prior blocks. He's been a constant source of negativity here and this wiki has been too lenient with him for too long. The block should be kept in place and extended to one year, or longer. -- Q* (talk) 16:30, November 18, 2014 (UTC)


 * Since you are on different "sides" here, I would like to hear more before I make a decision. Both of your points are valid, but I am insecure. Boggy has not been easy to be around, because he could change in a snap from being a helpful contributer into a raging debater. I believe that I decision the whole community can stand behind is the best solution.
 * - Danuhau (talk) 18:58, November 18, 2014 (UTC)


 * I drove for two hours today, and it gave me time to think. I have gone throught the incident between Boggy and Q*, which led to his block. I have started to suspect that Boggy framed Q* because he told me that he had been threatened by him on facebook, and the same profile contacted me. But that is just a hypothesis. Nevertheless, I think that these two fellas should not be allowed here at the same time, and I consider Q* the best man to have around.
 * - Danuhau (talk) 18:44, November 22, 2014 (UTC)


 * This Boggy guy is a nut, he should not be allowed back here. I agree with Q, his block should be extended to more than one year. Also, check out this argument he started with me, just because I supported Danuhau: http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Message_Wall:TTTEUK TTTEUK (talk) 13:04, November 23, 2014 (UTC)


 * Hmmm, I didn't think the community were so against him coming back. I should've given my suggestion more thought. I guess we'll just have to see what happens next month. By the way TTTEUK, I didn't see any arguments on your CC message wall. Was it removed? --Orangitu | Talk 16:26, November 23, 2014 (UTC)


 * I restored the dialogue which he obviously deleted. Please note how rude and self-absorbed he is in the way he talks to me. TTTEUK (talk) 20:13, November 23, 2014 (UTC)


 * Orangitu, I cannot understand why you still defend his case. I have made up my mind, his block must be extended. Just look at how he personally attacks TTTEUK, only because she does not support him. That is highly improfessional, and not the best for this wiki. I have not yet decided for how long, though.
 * - Danuhau (talk) 20:32, November 23, 2014 (UTC)

Usertags
They're working again now. If you're curious, you can check out the changes. And yeah, I've read the community message. Nice work, I've always been confused on what to write on it before.

Orangitu | Talk 12:20, November 21, 2014 (UTC)


 * I have to learn the coding before I can use it properly, so it is good to have others around! And I'm glad you like the community message; I prefer it like this, rather than keeping it blank.


 * - Danuhau (talk) 18:39, November 22, 2014 (UTC)

Blocks
I've unblocked PartHunter and TTTEUK, I don't know why you blocked them without warning or reason, and "reason state later" is not valid. This is exactly the sort of thing Oscuritaforze was talking about. I thought you were done with these arbitrary blocks but if you're going to keep doing it then you shouldn't be an admin. -- Q* (talk) 01:00, November 28, 2014 (UTC)


 * I checked the block list, and the time fits with when I was at school. Some of my friends must have blocked them, because they saw how I extended Boggy's block earlier that day. Thank you for taking charge, and I will personally apologize to both contributors. This is not something I would have done, because I have changed, just so you know it!
 * - Danuhau (talk) 21:24, December 13, 2014 (UTC)

Please explain Q*
Q*, what do you think you are doing? You have completely misunderstood something, it was not my fault that these user were blocked. Also, why do you think I am sockpuppeting? I cannot understand anything. IPs change, you know... I have informed Orangitu to fix this unless you unblock me and TTTEUK before he works this out. TTTEUK is NOT one of my accounts, I only have this one. So you don't have any reason to act out of suspection.

- Danuhau (talk) 18:02, November 29, 2014 (UTC)


 * UPDATE: I have figured the whole thing out, and it is a misunderstanding. This account belongs to my half-sister, who usually lives in Sweden. She is currently visiting us, and has tracked and supported me without me knowing it. But you could at least have confronted me, in stead of blocking me. I know that I did not give you a warning when you were blocked, but I have changed. If I had performed the block, I would have given a reason. Furthermore, who would block their own account? It proves your incompetence as admin since you did not warn me.

I'm back! :)
Luckily, I have returned to the wiki. I will not leave this wiki dead, because I have fallen in love with it. But Q* is no longer among us, as you can read more about here .

- Danuhau (talk) 21:24, December 13, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Contributions
This is my 95th day here. Unfortunally I don't know any friends who I could do so with. Also, there may be some way to promote Worms Wiki to users on Wikia, but I can't find out anything about such a thing. PartHunter (talk) 05:38, December 15, 2014 (UTC)


 * Wow, that is amazing! I have only contributed 34 days in a row, so it looks like you are beating me. Perhaps you are going for 365 day mark? :) Too bad about your friends though! I know I have heard about promoting wikis, I think it can be done throught community central, but I have never done it before. I guess I could try it this weekend, at least it is worth a shot! Danuhau (talk) 07:22, December 17, 2014 (UTC)


 * The way to promote a wiki via Community Central is the spotlight program, though this wiki currently doesn't qualify for it. Oscuritaforze (talk) 03:21, December 17, 2014 (UTC)

"Stopping By to Say Hi!"  (But really...)
Just wanted to note that I uploaded many pictures just now. Check them out! Coolcam6578 (talk) 19:06, January 5, 2015 (UTC)


 * I appreciate your effort, but these pictures do not add much, they are solely descriptions and tips. If you find something from these pictures that should be added in writing, feel free to add that, but I doubt the value of having these pictures. And by the way, please relax a little. You do not need to stress. If you want to become an admin, you should approach this in a calm manner :)


 * - Danuhau (talk) 19:40, January 5, 2015 (UTC)
 * But me helping out has nothing to do with becoming an admin! (Really!) Coolcam6578 (talk) 20:27, January 5, 2015 (UTC)


 * When you have applied for adminship, it does connect with that.
 * - Danuhau (talk) 20:56, January 5, 2015 (UTC)


 * Oh. so what you are saying is, I might be basicaly spamming unintentionaly? Coolcam6578 (talk) 22:00, January 5, 2015 (UTC)


 * No, not quite. I am just saying that it is a lot for me to patrol when you conduct so many edits in such a short period of time. But your edits have been quite useful! :)
 * - Danuhau (talk) 07:23, January 6, 2015 (UTC)

Worms Wiki
Can we talk? Please. add me on steam.

steamcommunity.com/id/koenachtig

Koenachtig 11:24, January 8, 2015 (UTC)


 * Excuse me, but I do not have steam. Do you know anywhere else we could talk, or would it be easier for you if I downloaded it? By the way, nice to finally talk to you!


 * - Danuhau (talk) 11:54, January 8, 2015 (UTC)


 * I'll be fine with Steam, skype or simply this wiki's chatroom. Whichever you prefer.
 * Koenachtig 12:10, January 8, 2015 (UTC)


 * The chat here is easy to access, so I will enter it now! :)
 * - Danuhau (talk) 12:11, January 8, 2015 (UTC)

Chat
I'm in ATM

Koenachtig 18:40, January 8, 2015 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I was out, there was a meeting at my school. I will enter it now, show up if you see this!


 * - Danuhau (talk) 19:42, January 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm active in chat
 * Koenachtig 14:10, January 10, 2015 (UTC)

Staff Pic
I'm making a staff page that shows the wiki's administrators more clearly. Therefore, I am making it so that the page shows the admin's name, but also an image. What I would like is for you to choose a pic that has something to do with the Worms Series, whether it is a weapon, location, or an individual worm itself. This will then be used above your name on the Worms Wiki:Administrators page. Thanks, LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 20:50, January 10, 2015 (UTC)

Stub Template
Hey mate,

I'd suggest keeping the Stub-template at the top of pages. This is how it is generally done on Wikia.

Cheers Koenachtig (talk) 19:19, January 12, 2015 (UTC)


 * Despite most wikis doing it that way, i think this is way more structured... Our readers should not be met with that at the start of a page.


 * - Danuhau (talk) 19:31, January 12, 2015 (UTC)

Yellow Team
I believe this is yellow although it could easily be a shade of orange. If it is yellow, then there is still a purple team in the game so basically, it will have just been a new team added. LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 20:24, January 12, 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you for submitting a source! I changed it in the article, what do you think?


 * - Danuhau (talk) 07:41, January 13, 2015 (UTC)


 * Looks good! LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 17:41, January 13, 2015 (UTC)

Regarding the staff applications.
Hey there. Due to the recent amount of staff applicants it seems we've been having trouble reaching a consensus in a timely manner. Koen and I came up with a way to deal with this problem, and that is to have a re-vote next week (Jan 23), where we all vote on the applicants again and have those with a majority of approval promoted immediately. This would be much better than waiting for everyone's opinion indefinitely. I'll see you then. --Orangitu | Talk 14:42, January 16, 2015 (UTC)


 * I support that proposition. I've been away these last days due to an extreme amount of homework and some trips, but I will be present at the re-vote!


 * - Danuhau (talk) 18:07, January 17, 2015 (UTC)

Anon edits
Hey mate,

How's things? Busy with school I guess?

We were wondering whether you could turn on anon-editing for us. We think the vandals are long gone by now.

Cheers, Koenachtig (talk) 19:05, January 26, 2015 (UTC)


 * If we can't disable anonymous editing twice, this might be a bad idea.


 * Boggy B (talk) 21:25, January 26, 2015 (UTC)


 * As far as I know, anon editing is enabled/disabled by wikia staff only, so we can always ask them to turn it back off if it gets really, really bad. Also, I support Koen's suggestion, I think anon editing should be turned back on. --Orangitu | Talk 10:19, January 27, 2015 (UTC)


 * You're implying that we can enable/disable it more than once, so I'm fine with this.


 * Boggy B (talk) 14:38, January 27, 2015 (UTC)


 * Before we draw a conclusion here, I would like to get a statement from the wikia staff. However, I believe they told me that it could be turned on and off whenever necessary. Despite this, I would not prefer to disable it right away. I can sum up some of the point i explained before I applied for it to be disabled:
 * - It would have been a whole different thing if accounts were a criteria when you would like to view the wiki, but it is only a requirement if you want to edit here. Like we experience with admin rights, editing is not for everyone
 * - It is not that hard to create an account if you do not have one, so if you really want to contribute, I recommend creating an account to do so. And just a remark based on experience: Users who can manage to create an account, are also smart enough to understand this wiki's policies, and contribute with good-faith. Anons can be anyone, who are able to mess things up because it is so easy to edit.
 * - If there will be an argument here, especially if it is between several anons, it will be hard to see who is who, and who to ban if that would be necessary. Also, IPs will keep changing, which will result in innocent users receiving an undeserved block.
 * - We have some users here who have made an account, and I believe they are satasfied. Nevertheless, I would like them to explain how this differs for them, as it would be a huge pro considering this debate.
 * - Danuhau (talk) 09:35, January 30, 2015 (UTC)